There is no crime worse than the killing of
innocents
Breivik took it upon himself to
launch an attack on a youth gathering. He strongly disagreed with what
he imagined was their ideology. Or rather, the leniency members of the
same party had displayed towards migration. More specifically, that
they had failed to limit immigration of Muslims to Norway. To make his
point, he outfitted himself with sufficient fire-power to start a small
scale war and started liquidating unarmed children with no defence and
no escape. After legal deliberations the court found him to be
legally
sane. That may just be
legally correct, but anyone
who can
justify cold-blooded murder of children is not sane by any other
standard. All the more so because Breivik sees himself as a hero. The
best testimony in court was given by a 14 year old girl.
She simply
called Breivik
a coward.
Tehreek-e-Taliban
Pakistan now claims responsibility for the shooting of young school-girl Malala. The similarities are frightening.
jeppe.jansen@yahoo.fr
congemo.blogspot.fr